Hi, all.

This thread is not that long, so I've read it all. I'm yet another
native Chinese user.

I agree with the idea of Taylor's origin post.

Some people want framework of frameworks. I appreciate their efforts.
However, I don't think this make sense if we consider long-term.

If someone is trying to make thing simpler and more elegant, go ahead.

I like the Mac OS X way of language settings. I'm happy to see GNOME
is catching up.

I don't know how much integration is done in code. But I think you
should examine both IBus and Fcitx carefully before hardcode anything.
I think the internally more elegant one should be picked.

>From various discussion I've seen, many experienced user would see
Fcitx to IBus migration as a serious regression. So be careful.
_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Reply via email to