On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Bastien Nocera <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 2012-10-19 at 15:30 +0200, Florian Max wrote: >> On vie, 2012-10-19 at 14:55 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote: >> On Fri, 2012-10-19 at 08:49 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: >> > > On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Bastien Nocera <[email protected]> >> > > wrote: >> > > > Note that I also intend on dropping session tracking support from >> > > > ConsoleKit.
That sounds to me like we won't be able to keep using the current CK path for session tracking - I'm most certainly against reimplementing removed CK bits in gnome-shell. > I would recommend that gnome-shell uses systemd to suspend Yeah, we should probably do that - filed as bug 686482. > and I would recommend gnome-shell, gnome-session and gdm also drop their > ConsoleKit > session tracking code. > At the end of the day, the decisions are not mine to make, so if the costs of > keeping > those options are low enough for you, then feel free to keep them. Well, it doesn't make much sense to run gnome-shell without gnome-settings-daemon. So if you change the latter to require either systemd or a dbus-compatible implementation, native CK support in the shell won't be too useful - in that sense, it *is* your decision :-) Note that I'm not complaining (I'm pretty sure the CK path is mostly untested nowadays until it reaches end users), just saying that I don't think we can consider g-s-d separately - a change like this will have implications for other modules as well. Regards, Florian _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
