On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 08:47 -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > I'm all for making GNOME+systemd kick ass. But not at the cost of > giving up the "rough consensus and working code" aspect that forms > GNOME > and other FOSS projects. > > Your process here was to post on a Friday that you were going to > delete > the code, have a lot of feedback even over the weekend, then on Monday > *do it anyways*.
I carefully answered every comment, and didn't make the decision lightly either. I could see 2 people with concerns over it, one concerned with OpenBSD, one with Ubuntu and Unity. Did I miss some opinions while making this decision? And even if I did not address all those concerns, am I contravening to the rules that were set out a year ago? https://live.gnome.org/ReleasePlanning/WhatWeRelease > That's just not the way we should approach problems in > GNOME. GNOME's way seems to be to postpone the hard decisions 6-month down the line. I've already had those same problems when I wanted to remove the date and time helper in January, even though we discussed having systemd as an external dependency in May the year before. _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
