Hi all,

I would think GNOME as OSS should treat everything open without
discriminating any input method platform or input method engines. Every
person has different value on quality, which creating a white/blacklist to
separate engines based on some criteria defined by a board is appropriate.

Input methods and keyboard layouts is NOT similar in any bit. Most of the
keyboard layouts are 1 to 1 key-char mapping but input method is superset
to that. I hope anyone who believes that check out the Cangjie input
method, since you need substantial (its a subjective word just as
low-quality mentioned in previous comments) information for you to defend
the whitelist approach.

I am against any filtering in input method / input method engine because
talking about user friendly or usability of GNOME to other high quality
environment, it should be beyond the whiltelist by public, too. I
personally urge GNOME devs leave the decision rights to IBus itself and its
engines, or just join the IBus development and work right on it instead of
hacking from GNOME.

Regards,
kaio


On 23 November 2012 22:15, Justin Wong <[email protected]> wrote:

> I should say fcitx with kimpanel still works at gnome 3.6 , but it's
>  running slower than that in gnome 3.4, and  even slower than that in gnome
> 3.2, which means a same extension is running slower and slower with
> gnome-shell upgrades.
>
> As ibus experience still sucks at gnome, ibus or gnome, which one would u
> drop?
> Yuanfang, what do you say?
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Ma Xiaojun <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> To make my point clear.
>>
>> Once we have a fixed framework of inputting.
>> Installing/Uninstalling a new engine should be similar to
>> installing/uninstalling a new app.
>> There is no black magic here.
>> _______________________________________________
>> desktop-devel-list mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Open Source,Open Mind
>
> Blog:    http://bigeagle.me/
> E-mail:  [email protected]
>
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-devel-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
>
_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Reply via email to