On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Matthias Clasen <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Piñeiro <[email protected]> wrote: > > Here is what I am seeing on my system right now: > > [mclasen@golem ~]$ rpm -q --whatrequires "libclutter-gtk-1.0.so.0()(64bit)" > libchamplain-gtk-0.12.3-5.fc19.x86_64 > cheese-libs-3.7.4-2.fc19.x86_64 > totem-3.6.3-3.fc19.x86_64 > cheese-3.7.4-2.fc19.x86_64 > gnome-photos-3.7.3-4.fc19.x86_64 > gnome-initial-setup-0.6-2.fc19.x86_64 > eog-plugins-3.6.1-2.fc19.x86_64 > gnome-games-gnibbles-3.6.1-2.fc19.x86_64 > gnome-games-quadrapassel-3.6.1-2.fc19.x86_64 > gnome-games-swell-foop-3.6.1-2.fc19.x86_64 > gnome-games-lightsoff-3.6.1-2.fc19.x86_64 > empathy-3.7.5-2.fc19.x86_64 > gnome-color-manager-3.7.5-1.fc19.x86_64 > gnome-boxes-3.7.5-1.fc19.x86_64 > control-center-3.7.5.1-1.fc19.x86_64 > sushi-3.7.5-1.fc19.x86_64 > gnome-documents-3.7.5-1.fc19.x86_64 > > A few of these will probably follow the gnome-documents example and > shed the clutter-gtk dependency in time for 3.8, and for some others, > having the (small) clutter parts inaccessible may not be a big deal > (e.g. the photo dialog in the user panel). It might help your decision > to evaluate a few of these apps to see how much their accessibility is > affected by clutter-gtk use - it might turn out that everything except > for documents, boxes and photos is fine... and if those 3 move to pure > gtk in time for 3.8, all is good.
We're making extensive use of clutter-gtk in Boxes so moving away from it in time for 3.8 does not sound realistic. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
