hi Brion,

On Tue, 2013-04-02 at 10:54 -0700, Brion Vibber wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Eduard Braun <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>         I've got a question regarding libRSVG: Is it still actively
>         developed by someone? Or only maintained rudimentary?

> I have the general impression that librsvg is no longer under active
> development. We use it for rasterizing SVGs to PNGs on Wikipedia, so
> we too have a collection of bug reports about rendering errors over on
> bugzilla.wikimedia.org...

Many projects are neither extremely active nor completely unmaintained.
(In case of librsvg, maintainers did some hacking seven months ago.)

It might be worth to contact maintainers explicitly (see
https://git.gnome.org/browse/librsvg/tree/librsvg.doap ) and kindly ask
for review of specific patches (overview of unreviewed patches at
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/browse.cgi?product=librsvg ), or to issue a
call for new blood (or invite active patch writers to co-maintainership)
if there is no interest in maintainership anymore.

I'm not aware of any alternative recommended within GNOME currently.

andre
-- 
Andre Klapper  |  [email protected]
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/

_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Reply via email to