Hi, Le mardi 02 avril 2013 à 21:04 +0200, Andre Klapper a écrit : > Many projects are neither extremely active nor completely unmaintained. > (In case of librsvg, maintainers did some hacking seven months ago.) > > It might be worth to contact maintainers explicitly (see > https://git.gnome.org/browse/librsvg/tree/librsvg.doap ) and kindly ask > for review of specific patches (overview of unreviewed patches at > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/browse.cgi?product=librsvg ), or to issue a > call for new blood (or invite active patch writers to co-maintainership) > if there is no interest in maintainership anymore. > > I'm not aware of any alternative recommended within GNOME currently.
I can't say it is much more active or maintained, but I would suggest to look at lasem, a library I'm working on for several years now. Compared to librsvg, support for filters is a bit behind, there's no CSS styling capability, and text rendering is even worse than librsvg. But it has a DOM like API, is quite fast, and has a large test suite. Plus it also can render mathml equations. More informations here: https://blogs.gnome.org/emmanuel/category/lasem/ https://git.gnome.org/browse/lasem/ Cheers, Emmanuel. _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
