On Sun, 2013-07-07 at 15:05 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 11:01:24AM +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > On Fri, 2013-07-05 at 08:45 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > > > On Thu, 2013-07-04 at 16:18 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > > > I haven't seen an app menu (gmenu) discussion in quite some time, which > > > > is a bit surprising as more apps add them. 3.10 will be the fourth > > > > release featuring app menus, and by now most GNOME applications have > > > > one. But the only information on the GNOME wiki seems to have been > > > > written for GNOME 3.4, and there seem to be some issues and > > > > inconsistencies with the implementation throughout the project. > > > > > > I've been using GNOME all that time and I'd never noticed them. > > > > > > This is the one in the top panel which, with focus-follows-mouse, > > > > Which is exactly one of the reasons why focus-follows-mouse isn't an > > option we offer/isn't supported. There's probably plenty more things > > that don't work well with focus-follows-mouse, so finding creative > > solutions to those problems might be required. > > This seems backward. F-f-m was here first,
Was where first? In GNOME? In metacity? In Unix desktops? In Xerox Parc? > and is still being used by some > minority (me included). Current designs break f-f-m functionality. Your > comment > about ”finding creative solutions” sounds like F-f-m was something new. It's not something new, it's something unsupported. > Designs were made in total ignorance of f-f-m. Because it's unsupported. > The requirement should be > restated as ”finding creative solutions for things that used to work”, i.e. > things > that were already working, were ”solved”. _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
