Sriram Ramkrishna <[email protected]> wrote: ... > I think though, as someone else further in the thread said, we want to > make a distinction between 'quick start' and the manual.
I honestly don't see why the manual can't contain a quick start section - we do this in other documentation without issue. Again: the manual ranks highly in search results for "jhbuild", and attracts attention as, well, the JHBuild documentation. For newcomers it is at best a dead end, and at worst misleading. So in my opinion, something really needs to be done about the manual. > So, let's try to get something actionable. Fred and Carlos are already doing something actionable - they've put time and energy into integrating the BuildGnome page into the JHBuild manual, and converting it to Mallard. > Do folks agree that we > should have two pieces - the manual and the quick start where the > quickstart is the BuildGnome documentation maintained by Carlos and > the JHBuild manual supported by the community. Personally, no, I don't agree (as explained above). But really, it's up to the people doing the work. Allan _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
