On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Carlos Soriano Sanchez <[email protected]> wrote:
> > - What do I propose? > So, what we actually need is a "Canonical documentation for contributing > gnome". In developers.gnome.org. > As I offered before for the Jhbuild one, I offer me volunteer (with whoever > wants to join) for this one as well. > > Then we won't care about jhbuild or xdg-app, we will write there whatever is > better and easier at that time. Then having > multiple jhbuild tutorials in the wiki will stop to make sense at all for > sure. > > What do you think? > For me when this came to my mind I saw the light in the tunnel =) > Thanks for following up! Really happy to see that we're re-visiting this topic. I think you're idea has merit. We will need to find some way to make sure that people can discover this documetation easily from the main page. I hope that we can take all the work that others have done and roll it into this and have it maintained. I think that has been one of the biggest problem with our documentation. The content changes so rapidly that the documentation lags behind. We really need a process of good discoverability that allows the documentation team to be able to capture these changes and update as needed. More than that, maintainers need to be invested in this. People are not going to use your software if you make it hard for them to use it. So philosophically, I'd like to see more investment in this. Otherwise, we're going to have a lousy app story. sri _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
