On Thu, 2016-07-21 at 14:12 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: > Hi; > > On 21 July 2016 at 13:42, Ikey Doherty <michael.i.dohe...@intel.com> > wrote: > > So Jeremy Bicha kindly contacted me the other day to express > > concern > > with Budgie/GNOME Screensaver. I had been toying with the notion of > > forking GNOME Screensaver due to its deadness, and making it work > > better for Budgie/Modern GNOME integration. > > > > Jeremy correctly pointed out it might be worth maintaining the > > project instead, which I'm up for. > > AFAIR, gnome-screensaver is part of the "Flashback" session: > > https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/GnomeFlashback > > given that it uses Metacity.
I don't know how well that works, or whether they've replaced gnome- screensaver and gnome-settings-daemon yet. I refused to add hacks to gnome-settings-daemon to make it work under GNOME Flashback as there were just too many things that wouldn't work properly with it. I think a fork/rename would be the best option to avoid confusion in the bug tracker. Given the number of time I have to reassign bugs about the desktop file manager window to nautilus from gnome-desktop, it would probably be best if bugs weren't stuck there. _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
