Le dimanche 02 avril 2017 à 14:59 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi a écrit : > Yes, I know: this would be slightly more easier if Continuous warned > about build breakages via email (though I'm pretty sure email would > still be a high latency medium that tends to be ignored); > nevertheless, joining the #testable IRC channel *today* to get a > notification of build failure is *not* a heavy burden — especially > now > that we have the Matrix bridge and you don't even need an IRC client > running at all times.
Is this important for projects that already have their own CI system ? (notably GStreamer). It does seems like an overhead to track two CI, I do believe that build breakage due to warning should be quite rare in GStreamer case. Please let us know. Nicolas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
