On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 11:37:31AM +0000, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: > On Sun, 27 Jan 2019 at 09:24, Debarshi Ray <rishi...@lostca.se> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 11:00:58AM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > I don't think that feature requests should be treated on the same level > > > as existing, merged, features > > > > I can't change my theme, I can't change my fonts, no minimize button, > > no wallpaper options, my laptop insists on suspending ... > > > > Can I have those back? > > > > Install Tweaks.
And you can install a web browser, nautilus and evince; but, hey, guess what? You already have those! > See, that's kind of the difference between removing infrastructure and > removing UI for it. > > Even if you're removing infrastructure, we do have mechanisms and policies > for transitioning between the initial and final points: versioned > interfaces, soname bumps, new dependencies, deprecations. Oh, you mean like GTK dropping geometry support and breaking GNOME Terminal one day: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=760944 I wonder what mechanisms or policies were in play there. I do know that some brave souls scurried to workaround that in GNOME Terminal. I'll let the reader guess how many people use GNOME Documents versus those who use GNOME Terminal or care about themes or fonts or minimize buttons or wallpapers or suspend? _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
