> On 4 May 2019, at 00:29, [email protected] wrote: > >> On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 5:09 AM, Bastien Nocera <[email protected]> wrote: >> - And to what? >> A few possible names were mentioned/used. "mainline" was thought to >> have strong connections to drug use, "release" (use in the contributor >> covenant) seems to restrictive (we also do releases from other >> branches). I like "main" because it keeps 2 letters from "master" so >> diminishes the need to retrain your muscle memory. "trunk" definitely >> makes sense when talking about branches but doesn't have the "ma<tab>" >> advantage. > > "main" seems like it should be safe, yet since you linked to > https://github.com/ContributorCovenant/contributor_covenant/issues/569 it > seems fair to quote the second comment there: > >> "Main" suggests inequality, I'm against that. > > So good luck finding an inoffensive name for the, er, primary branch. (I > probably shouldn't say "primary," though, since primacy also suggests > inequality....)
Seriously Michael, you’re embarrassing yourself. _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
