On Wed, 2020-04-29 at 17:03 -0400, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > > The best you can do is have a mapping of common DEs to their > > preferred > > toolkits > > This would mean each Gtk-based DE will require a patch to OpenJDK, > which is unsustainable.
I agree that this is inconvenient but in the absence of a better option, you either make a list, or come up with some heuristic. > > There is no such thing as GTK desktop > > Wikipedia has its own category: > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Desktop_environments_based_on_GTK But that is only what people see. Desktops do not care about toolkits, only thing that matters is that the app can connect to the desktop’s display server. And while it would be possible to make desktops record the consensus on the preference of toolkits in their respective communities and expose it via some API like an environment variable, someone would need to come up with the API and then convince all desktop environments it is something they should implement. Given the limited usefulness of such API, I do not see anyone spending time on that effort. And even if someone decides to standardize it and sends merge requests to all major desktop environments, it will still take ages before it is widely available. > In regards to Gtk2 versus Gtk3 binding, those issues haven't changed > as results of this missing variable. How do they decide if they should use GTK 3 or GTK 2? > I'm not sure I understand the reluctance to provide such information. I do not think anyone is opposed to that but I doubt anyone will consider it a priority. Especially since the intersection of toolkits supported by AWT and toolkits prefered can be emulated using much simpler algorithm. preferred | GTK | Qt | EFL ----------|-----|-----|-----| has GTK | GTK | GTK | GTK | no GTK |error|Motif|Motif| _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
