Brian Cameron <Brian.Cameron at Sun.COM> wrote:
> > So, why use GDM instead of KDM then? Other than "because it's there" ?
>
> If someone wants to make KDM support Solaris, I think that would
> be great. As I explained, I think a11y support was the main reason
> we picked GDM over KDM initially.
>From my understanding, this would either need a binary standard for C++
or a way to define a different LD_RUN_PATH for gcc compiled binaries.
But the latter would not share all code in memory.
J?rg
--
EMail:joerg at schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) J?rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
js at cs.tu-berlin.de (uni)
schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog:
http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
