Alan Coopersmith <alan.coopersmith at sun.com> wrote:
> Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > Brian Cameron <Brian.Cameron at Sun.COM> wrote:
> >
> >>> So, why use GDM instead of KDM then? Other than "because it's there" ?
> >> If someone wants to make KDM support Solaris, I think that would
> >> be great. As I explained, I think a11y support was the main reason
> >> we picked GDM over KDM initially.
> >
> >From my understanding, this would either need a binary standard for C++
> > or a way to define a different LD_RUN_PATH for gcc compiled binaries.
>
> Why? KDM is an application, not a library.
I thought an application links to libraries.
J?rg
--
EMail:joerg at schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) J?rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
js at cs.tu-berlin.de (uni)
schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog:
http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
