Wine and mono are unrelated and architecturally different.  Wine  
translates the Win32 api, while Mono implements the CLR and directly  
consumes .NET source files and assemblies.  Native vs managed  
here... .NET is mainly of interest for current and future business  
applications, and thankfully it's easier than translating Win32  
api's... also consider that Mono CLR is portable, and has less  
overhead than translator + emulator for non-x86 architectures.  Game  
emulators like snes9x are easy(ish) to port, natively, there's no need  
to do double the overhead when most of them can be ported from linux/ 
x11.

As for uTorrent, I see there's a following who like it, but there's  
Rtorrent, Ctorrent, Ktorrent, bittorrent (C/Python) and many others.   
I don't see why it's so hard to adopt any of those, there's nothing  
that utorrent offers that one or more of the available ported  
bittorrent clients don't have.  Disk access is a major overhead to  
running wine applications, especially considering Solaris is a second- 
class citizen anyways, and in particular due to differences in design  
and intentions things are still suffering due to bad porting, or  
failed attempts to completely rewrite aspects that should had been.

I believe the future is with Mono and native, Wine is a stop-gap and  
Codeweavers will listen to us soon enough.  As a community it's easier  
to support actually documented technology, while wine is hunt and  
guess still.

James
On Jun 21, 2008, at 8:31 AM, Christian Ortiz wrote:

> I voted for wine because some of the things that OpenSolaris lacks  
> are applications. we need programs like wine or mono, these are the  
> base to run more applications
>
> For example BitTorrent. You could use the mainline client or with  
> some work you can get Vuze(Azureus) working, but i'd prefer to run  
> uTorrent if possible.With wine we could run windows games like the  
> orange box, Starcraft or ZSnes.
>
> While you can do some of this with virtual box it has an overhead in  
> memory and CPU.
>
>
> This message posted from opensolaris.org
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-discuss mailing list
> desktop-discuss at opensolaris.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/desktop-discuss/attachments/20080621/4c9586f3/attachment.html>

Reply via email to