Karl,
How about those components completely owned by us?
evolution-jescs is the jescs connector of evolution and only my team is
working on it. We have fixed several p2 bugs recently to make it more
usable and stable. We have done some unit tests and haven't found any
regressions. We have planned to release a new tarball for vermillion
41.
In this case, can we use the new tarball or do we have to wait until
42? As we are going to use the new code anyway, I think we can use the
new tarball to let more users use it earlier. What do you think?
Thanks!
Harry
On ???, 2006-05-11 at 16:16 +0100, Karl Gaffney wrote:
> RE/Developers
>
> As most of you know vermillion_41 is being built next week. This is the
> candidate built for integration into Nevada_41. It's imperative that we
> don't destabilise this build by putting in unnecessary fixes. Please
> consider very carefully what fixes you are putting back, priorities are:-
>
> o Branding
> o Show Stopper bugs *only*
> o New versions of required package up-revs, i.e. libxml2
> o Package history files.
>
> Do not rev to newer or later community tarballs, they may contain regressions.
> If in doubt, please discuss with us.
>
> Regards
> Karl.
