I agree.

-Karl.

Glynn Foster wrote:
> Hey,
> 
> Harry Lu wrote:
>>     In this case, can we use the new tarball or do we have to wait until
>> 42? As we are going to use the new code anyway, I think we can use the
>> new tarball to let more users use it earlier. What do you think?
> 
> I think bumping to a newer version of evolution-jescs is fine, given 
> that you're in complete control of the module. Obviously this is just my 
> opinion ;)
> 
> 
> Glynn
> 


Reply via email to