And as an example of this name being problematic, vivid's name for this wallpaper is "Suru_Wallpaper_Desktop_4096x2304_Gray.png".
So if I were to try to switch unity8-dash to use the system "paper" wallpaper instead of its built-in custom one, I'd point at "Suru_Wallpaper_Desktop_4096x2304_Gray.png" for vivid and "Xerus_Wallpaper_Grey_4096x2304.png" for xenial, and who knows what in yakkety. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-wallpapers in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1592870 Title: Xerus_Wallpaper_Grey_4096x2304.png is a terrible default wallpaper filename Status in ubuntu-wallpapers package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: "Xerus_Wallpaper_Grey_4096x2304.png" is not a good filename for a default wallpaper. - It encodes the release where it first appeared. I would have assumed we'd learned that lesson from "warty-final-ubuntu.png", which is *still* our default wallpaper filename. - It encodes the image size, which makes it awkward when/if we ever update the file to a different size. Why didn't we just name it "ubuntu-grey.png" or something? Is it too late to do so? With a symlink involved for backwards compatibility. We could probably never drop the symlink, because we actually released this file into the wild... But at least we'd be trying. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-wallpapers/+bug/1592870/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

