And as an example of this name being problematic, vivid's name for this
wallpaper is "Suru_Wallpaper_Desktop_4096x2304_Gray.png".

So if I were to try to switch unity8-dash to use the system "paper"
wallpaper instead of its built-in custom one, I'd point at
"Suru_Wallpaper_Desktop_4096x2304_Gray.png" for vivid and
"Xerus_Wallpaper_Grey_4096x2304.png" for xenial, and who knows what in
yakkety.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-wallpapers in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1592870

Title:
  Xerus_Wallpaper_Grey_4096x2304.png is a terrible default wallpaper
  filename

Status in ubuntu-wallpapers package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  "Xerus_Wallpaper_Grey_4096x2304.png" is not a good filename for a
  default wallpaper.

  - It encodes the release where it first appeared.  I would have
  assumed we'd learned that lesson from "warty-final-ubuntu.png", which
  is *still* our default wallpaper filename.

  - It encodes the image size, which makes it awkward when/if we ever
  update the file to a different size.

  Why didn't we just name it "ubuntu-grey.png" or something?  Is it too
  late to do so?  With a symlink involved for backwards compatibility.
  We could probably never drop the symlink, because we actually released
  this file into the wild...  But at least we'd be trying.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-wallpapers/+bug/1592870/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to     : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to