It seems that we have node-zmq autopkgtests failing with the new zeromq
in yakkety. I will try looking into that and see if we can have all this
working properly without pulling in any new node-zmq upstream version -
if this won't work then I'll be opting for removing this SRU from
-proposed.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to zeromq3 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1645308

Title:
  [SRU] Backport zeromq3 4.2.0 to yakkety

Status in zeromq3 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in zeromq3 source package in Yakkety:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  [Impact]

  As per product requirement, we have released a git-snapshot based pre-
  release version of zeromq3 4.2.0 to yakkety
  (4.1.5+git20160811+2fc86bc) as the upstream version was not yet
  available. The agreement was that we will release the snapshot-based
  version only if, once the official update is available we will update
  and switch.

  The rationale for this would be that the snapshot-based version is
  anyway more-or-less feature compatible with the official version. It's
  also not wise to keep shipping a snapshot for long as some bugfixes
  might be missing from the cherry-pick. The generated binaries are
  binary-compatible, with only a few new symbols exported in the main
  4.2.0 version.

  [Test Case]

  No particular test-case - installing the new version and making sure
  that existing reverse-dependencies still work as intended.

  [Regression Potential]

  There is, of course, some regression potential, but as already
  mentioned: there weren't too many commits since the git snapshot that
  our previous version was based off.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zeromq3/+bug/1645308/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to     : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to