There's something from the polkit rules that worries me. I don't think
we want the rules to be this open. Could someone more conversant with
polkit rules give them a read and report back if this is something we
really want?

Something that specifically worried me:

          - Normal users need admin authentication to install software
            system-wide.
          - Note that we install polkit rules that allow local users
            in the wheel group to install without authenticating.


Thanks

** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libglnx/-/issues #2
   https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libglnx/-/issues/2

** Bug watch added: github.com/flatpak/flatpak/issues #4223
   https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/issues/4223

** Bug watch added: github.com/flatpak/flatpak/issues #4224
   https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/issues/4224

** Bug watch added: github.com/flatpak/flatpak/issues #4233
   https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/issues/4233

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1812456

Title:
  [MIR] libflatpak0

Status in flatpak package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Many applications have Flatpak integration using libflatpak. The
  Ubuntu desktop team would like libflatpak0 in main so we can easily
  build such applications. It takes a lot of work to make these
  dependencies optional and sometimes that is not possible. We don't
  need the Flatpak functionality to work by default and do not expect
  any other Flatpak packages to be installed by default.

  Default packages that have flatpak integration:
  - gnome-control-center (application panel).
  - malcontent (parental controls)

  Availability
  ============
  In Universe, builds for all architectures and in sync with Debian.

  Rationale
  =========
  Multiple default packages have libflatpak as a dependency, including 
malcontent (LP: #1892456).

  Security
  ========
  This will need a Security review.

  https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/source-package/flatpak

  There have been two CVEs, both have been fixed in all supported Ubuntu
  releases.

  More recently, there is LP: #1815528

  Quality Assurance
  =================
  Bug subscriber: should be Ubuntu Desktop Bugs

  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak
  https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=flatpak
  https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/issues

  tests are run as build tests (with dh_auto_test) and installed autopkgtests 
on Debian and Ubuntu.
  https://ci.debian.net/packages/f/flatpak
  http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/f/flatpak

  UI Standards
  ============
  N/A

  Dependencies
  ============
  All in main except for libostree-1-1 (LP: #1892454)

  Standards Compliance
  ====================
  Package uses standards version 4.5.0.

  Maintenance
  ===========
  - Actively developed upstream
  https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak

  - Maintained in Debian by the pkg-utopia team but more specifically,
  it is maintained by Simon McVittie (smcv) who maintains Flatpak,
  ostree, xdg-dbus-proxy, xdg-desktop-portal and xdg-desktop-portal-gtk.

  short dh7 style rules, dh compat 10

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1812456/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to     : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to