> Could you provide some details on how you set a profile which isn't available?
I invoked powerprofilectl and "fixed" the performance profile using that. And then gnome-control-center would throw a fatal assertion failure (UI cannot open, basically total non-function of the app), and stop working. If the profile setting is rolled back using the same powerprofilectl, it can be opened again. The patch from upstream converts this error into a logged non-fatal warning. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037503 Title: [jammy]backport #1453 from upstream Status in gnome-control-center package in Ubuntu: Incomplete Status in gnome-control-center package in Debian: New Bug description: In some cases, it was possible for a profile to be set (directly, or through a hold) even though it wasn't supported. Don't assert in those cases. The bug in question makes the gnome-control-center crash if an unsupported power profile is set using, say, powerprofilesctl. Should be trivial to cherry-pick without breaking other components. https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/-/merge_requests/1453 I had to wait for this long because I expected a 42.x backport in the backports repository of .1 release, but no one bothered to do such a backport. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/2037503/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
