> The fact that we didn't see reports about it until now is also an
indication that it's not a common problem
Hard to encounter by a casual office user, but power users, overclockers
and high performance gamers are very likely to encounter this bug
("performance" profile is conditionally hidden by the gnome-control-
center but the test hiding it does not always work correctly, sometimes
it is hidden even when it is actually available by the hardware, such as
I encountered in my Zen 3 processor).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037503
Title:
[jammy]backport #1453 from upstream
Status in gnome-control-center package in Ubuntu:
Incomplete
Status in gnome-control-center package in Debian:
New
Bug description:
In some cases, it was possible for a profile to be set (directly, or
through a hold) even though it wasn't supported. Don't assert in those
cases.
The bug in question makes the gnome-control-center crash if an unsupported
power profile is set using, say, powerprofilesctl.
Should be trivial to cherry-pick without breaking other components.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/-/merge_requests/1453
I had to wait for this long because I expected a 42.x backport in the
backports repository of .1 release, but no one bothered to do such a
backport.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/2037503/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
