Public bug reported: [Availability] The package roc-toolkit is already in Ubuntu universe. The package roc-toolkit build for the architectures it is designed to work on. It currently builds and works for architectures: amd64 arm64 armhf ppc64el riscv64 s390x Link to package https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/roc-toolkit
[Rationale] - The package roc-toolkit is required in Ubuntu main to be able to make the corresponding plugin in pipewire available - The corresponding plugin will not be used by default in Ubuntu but we still want it available. We could split it to a new binary that would go to universe but then it would need to be manually installed and force us to carry a packaging delta over Debian. - There is no other/better way to solve this that is already in main or should go universe->main instead of this. - The request is about promoting the libroc0.3 binary, roc-toolkit-tools will stay in universe - The package roc-toolkit is required in Ubuntu main no later than Feb 29 due to the Noble Feature Freeze [Security] - No CVEs/security issues in this software in the past - no `suid` or `sgid` binaries - no executables in `/sbin` and `/usr/sbin` - Package does not install services, timers or recurring jobs - Packages does not open privileged ports (ports < 1024). - Package does not expose any external endpoints - Packages does not contain extensions to security-sensitive software [Quality assurance - function/usage] - The package works well right after install [Quality assurance - maintenance] - The package is maintained well in Debian/Ubuntu/Upstream and has no downstream reports The upstream tracker has mostly feature requests and no really important problems - Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/roc-toolkit/+bug - Debian https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=roc-toolkit - Upstream's bug tracker https://github.com/roc-streaming/roc-toolkit/issues - The package has important open bugs, listing them: TBD - The package does not deal with exotic hardware we cannot support [Quality assurance - testing] - The package runs a test suite on build time, if it fails it makes the build fail, link to build log https://launchpadlibrarian.net/702614513/buildlog_ubuntu-noble-amd64.roc-toolkit_0.3.0+dfsg-5_BUILDING.txt.gz python3 scripts/scons_helpers/timeout-run.py 300 bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/roc-test-core .................................................. .................................................. .................. OK (118 tests, 118 ran, 86418 checks, 0 ignored, 0 filtered out, 11 ms) - The package does not run an autopkgtest currently but a patch will be provided to add the upstream testsuite as an autopkgtest: TBD - The package does have not failing autopkgtests right now [Quality assurance - packaging] - debian/watch is present and works - debian/control defines a correct Maintainer - This package does not has important lintian warnings # lintian --pedantic roc-toolkit_0.3.0+dfsg-4_amd64.changes W: roc-toolkit-tools: groff-message troff:<standard input>:132: warning: cannot select font 'C' [usr/share/man/man1/roc-copy.1.gz:1] W: roc-toolkit-tools: groff-message troff:<standard input>:144: warning: cannot select font 'C' [usr/share/man/man1/roc-copy.1.gz:2] W: roc-toolkit-tools: groff-message troff:<standard input>:156: warning: cannot select font 'C' [usr/share/man/man1/roc-copy.1.gz:3] W: roc-toolkit-tools: groff-message ... use "--tag-display-limit 0" to see all (or pipe to a file/program) P: roc-toolkit source: package-does-not-install-examples [src/public_api/examples/] - Lintian overrides are not present - This package does not rely on obsolete or about to be demoted packages. - This package has no python2 or GTK2 dependencies - The package will be installed by default, but does not ask debconf questions - Packaging and build is easy, link to debian/rules https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/roc- toolkit/-/blob/master/debian/rules [UI standards] - Application is not end-user facing (does not need translation) [Dependencies] - There are further dependencies that are not yet in main, MIR for them is at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/speexdsp/+bug/2047149 [Standards compliance] - This package correctly follows FHS and Debian Policy [Maintenance/Owner] - The owning team will be desktop-packages and I have their acknowledgement for that commitment - The future owning team is already subscribed to the package - This does not use static builds - This does not use vendored code - The package has been built in the archive more recently than the last test rebuild [Background information] The Package description explains the package well Upstream Name is roc-toolkit Link to upstream project https://github.com/roc-streaming/roc-toolkit/ ** Affects: roc-toolkit (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to roc-toolkit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2047150 Title: [MIR] roc-toolkit Status in roc-toolkit package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: [Availability] The package roc-toolkit is already in Ubuntu universe. The package roc-toolkit build for the architectures it is designed to work on. It currently builds and works for architectures: amd64 arm64 armhf ppc64el riscv64 s390x Link to package https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/roc-toolkit [Rationale] - The package roc-toolkit is required in Ubuntu main to be able to make the corresponding plugin in pipewire available - The corresponding plugin will not be used by default in Ubuntu but we still want it available. We could split it to a new binary that would go to universe but then it would need to be manually installed and force us to carry a packaging delta over Debian. - There is no other/better way to solve this that is already in main or should go universe->main instead of this. - The request is about promoting the libroc0.3 binary, roc-toolkit-tools will stay in universe - The package roc-toolkit is required in Ubuntu main no later than Feb 29 due to the Noble Feature Freeze [Security] - No CVEs/security issues in this software in the past - no `suid` or `sgid` binaries - no executables in `/sbin` and `/usr/sbin` - Package does not install services, timers or recurring jobs - Packages does not open privileged ports (ports < 1024). - Package does not expose any external endpoints - Packages does not contain extensions to security-sensitive software [Quality assurance - function/usage] - The package works well right after install [Quality assurance - maintenance] - The package is maintained well in Debian/Ubuntu/Upstream and has no downstream reports The upstream tracker has mostly feature requests and no really important problems - Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/roc-toolkit/+bug - Debian https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=roc-toolkit - Upstream's bug tracker https://github.com/roc-streaming/roc-toolkit/issues - The package has important open bugs, listing them: TBD - The package does not deal with exotic hardware we cannot support [Quality assurance - testing] - The package runs a test suite on build time, if it fails it makes the build fail, link to build log https://launchpadlibrarian.net/702614513/buildlog_ubuntu-noble-amd64.roc-toolkit_0.3.0+dfsg-5_BUILDING.txt.gz python3 scripts/scons_helpers/timeout-run.py 300 bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/roc-test-core .................................................. .................................................. .................. OK (118 tests, 118 ran, 86418 checks, 0 ignored, 0 filtered out, 11 ms) - The package does not run an autopkgtest currently but a patch will be provided to add the upstream testsuite as an autopkgtest: TBD - The package does have not failing autopkgtests right now [Quality assurance - packaging] - debian/watch is present and works - debian/control defines a correct Maintainer - This package does not has important lintian warnings # lintian --pedantic roc-toolkit_0.3.0+dfsg-4_amd64.changes W: roc-toolkit-tools: groff-message troff:<standard input>:132: warning: cannot select font 'C' [usr/share/man/man1/roc-copy.1.gz:1] W: roc-toolkit-tools: groff-message troff:<standard input>:144: warning: cannot select font 'C' [usr/share/man/man1/roc-copy.1.gz:2] W: roc-toolkit-tools: groff-message troff:<standard input>:156: warning: cannot select font 'C' [usr/share/man/man1/roc-copy.1.gz:3] W: roc-toolkit-tools: groff-message ... use "--tag-display-limit 0" to see all (or pipe to a file/program) P: roc-toolkit source: package-does-not-install-examples [src/public_api/examples/] - Lintian overrides are not present - This package does not rely on obsolete or about to be demoted packages. - This package has no python2 or GTK2 dependencies - The package will be installed by default, but does not ask debconf questions - Packaging and build is easy, link to debian/rules https://salsa.debian.org/multimedia-team/roc- toolkit/-/blob/master/debian/rules [UI standards] - Application is not end-user facing (does not need translation) [Dependencies] - There are further dependencies that are not yet in main, MIR for them is at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/speexdsp/+bug/2047149 [Standards compliance] - This package correctly follows FHS and Debian Policy [Maintenance/Owner] - The owning team will be desktop-packages and I have their acknowledgement for that commitment - The future owning team is already subscribed to the package - This does not use static builds - This does not use vendored code - The package has been built in the archive more recently than the last test rebuild [Background information] The Package description explains the package well Upstream Name is roc-toolkit Link to upstream project https://github.com/roc-streaming/roc-toolkit/ To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/roc-toolkit/+bug/2047150/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
