On Friday 27 January 2006 17:36, Dan Kegel wrote: > Don't underestimate the difficulty of porting non-cross-platform apps.
Most applications are not cross-platform, and believe it or not, cross-platform applications don't matter as much as people think. If the market is there then ISVs will pull their fingers out and maintain a Linux port no matter how long it takes - it's that simple. Google appear to be doing that, but they're not really an ISV in the usual sense. They'll be distributing a freely available app to get people coming to their sites and using their services, and Linux was a distant third in the pecking order. I'm curious as to why people think cross-platform applications matter within the context of promoting desktop Linux in general. Cross-platform development is something the ISV decides to do, and no one else. Either you try and encourage existing ISVs to convert to using cross-platform development tools so they can port to Linux (a very vain hope), or for those writing specifically for the Linux desktop you open up the possibility of people going right back to Windows. Desktop Linux has either got something useful Windows hasn't got for it to be meaningful, or it hasn't. That black and white thinking might not be liked, but there it is. I'm also very curious as to why people think that running open source applications like K3B on Windows matters, which I find even more bizarre. If people want to run these applications on Windows then that means Windows is just plain better, and they aren't going to move. You are also developing free promotional applications for Microsoft, with your own free time and effort, to effectively keep people on Windows. David _______________________________________________ Desktop_architects mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop_architects
