On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Thomas Weise <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > Malhar in its current state, has way too many operators that fall in > the > > > "non-production quality" category. We should make it obvious to users > > that > > > which operators are up to par, and which operators are not, and maybe > > even > > > remove those that are likely not ever used in a real use case. > > > > > > > I am ambivalent about revisiting older operators and doing this exercise > as > > this can cause unnecessary tensions. My original intent is for > > contributions going forward. > > > > > IMO it is important to address this as well. Operators outside the play > area should be of well known quality. > > Thomas > I would ask we take that up as a separate discussion. Thanks
