> > > > > > > > > Malhar in its current state, has way too many operators that fall in > the > > > "non-production quality" category. We should make it obvious to users > > that > > > which operators are up to par, and which operators are not, and maybe > > even > > > remove those that are likely not ever used in a real use case. > > > > > > > I am ambivalent about revisiting older operators and doing this exercise > as > > this can cause unnecessary tensions. My original intent is for > > contributions going forward. > > > > > IMO it is important to address this as well. Operators outside the play > area should be of well known quality. > > I think this is important, and I don't anticipate much tension if we establish clear criteria. It's not helpful if we let the old subpar operators stay and put up the bars for new operators.
David
