Reinhard Poetz schrieb: > Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote: >> Felix Knecht (JIRA) pisze: >>> [ >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-2091?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel >>> ] >>> >>> Felix Knecht closed COCOON-2091. -------------------------------- >>> >>> Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.2-dev (Current SVN) >>> >>> - Added xinha and needed stylesheets to cocoon-forms-impl - Added >>> sample to cocoon-forms-sample >>> >>> The xinha license seems to be still the same license htmlarea used >>> (htmlarea license). As this license has already be used and is also >>> listed in the legal folder I don't see any problems concerning the >>> license. >>> >>> Feel free to reopen if any error occur. >> >> I haven't tested your changes but I would like to something more >> general. >> >> I wonder if you have not hurried up too much with this change. Even >> though Xinha is an obvious replacement for HTMLArea they are _not_ >> the same projects. I think that if someone wants to switch to a new >> project she should give others a few days for comments, raising >> concerns etc. Of course, I think that formal vote would be overkill >> in this case. >> >> It's especially valid in this case because Rice proposed to use >> Dojo's editor as an alternative. I was going to raise the same issue >> but wanted to do some research before so I could add some value to >> the discussion. Unfortunately, I have not had enough time to do it. >> >> Felix, all in all, I'm not against this particular change and >> speaking honestly I _am_ happy that we finally moved to Xinha but I >> couldn't resist commenting general practise. > > Was htmlarea removed completly or is it just a styling option whether > I want to use Xinha or Htmlarea?
It's just a styling option you have (xinha instead of htmlarea) and no real replacement has be done. You can use both at the moment, it depends on the styling option you use. I agree, 'replacment' was definitely the wrong term. It's an addition that you now have the choice which one you want to use. > > Without having a deprecation period I'm against a complet removal of > htmlarea as users might have their own configurations (e.g. Daisy Wiki). >
