Grzegorz Kossakowski skrev:
Daniel Fagerstrom pisze:
...
Sorry for little offending words but I'm really tired repeating the
same thing around ten times and
being blamed in the end.
In general, if one repeat the same thing ten times whithout anyone
understanding it, it just might be relevant feedback on ones
presentation style ;)
I would be grateful for any criticism and I am aware that my English skills are
not of highest
order.
I have no problems following your English, so its good enogh for me. I
leave the finer details to the native speakers ;)
So here goes my humble request:
If you really have hard times understanding me or I'm just boring for too long
don't hesitate to
just point it. I've already learned a lot from this community and polishing
communication skills
would be great addition. :-)
I'll point it out next time I have some specific suggestion. A more
general suggestion is that when you use referential words like "it" or
"this" I often have to make an effort to find out what you are refering
to which sometimes makes it time consuming to understand what you mean.
If you would be more generous in repeating what object you refer to it
would help me.
Concrete examples helps tremendesly for understanding things. But I'm of
course aware about that they take time to construct and describe and
that it is an aera where most of us could improve ;)
I hope that we can summarize current situation, cut new release
candidate of C2.2 and return back to
whiteboard for a while.
Anyway, my propsal that you give an explicit description about the
assumed state before and after the context change, is a serious
proposal. If you have described it, please give me a link. Otherwise it
would be really helpfull if you write it down.
Ok, I'll write separate e-mail explaining how everything is supposed to work.
Great!
/Daniel
