Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
On Dec 7, 2007, at 2:59 AM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Thanks for quick fix! btw why bean is named
"org.apache.cocoon.portal.om.CopletAdapter.cocoon" and not
"org.apache.cocoon.portal.om.CopletAdapter/cocoon"?
Good question - to be honest, I don't know :)
I think there were some problems with using a "/" in Spring bean names
Hmm... That's bad.
It's not really a problem. You can't use "/" in id attributes. That was the
reason why <bean name=""/> was introduced because Spring webflow needed a way to
put URIs into bean ids.
and I saw that I used a "." already in other configurations for the
portal. I guess in the end, it doesn't matter as these components are
accessed through our spring configurator bean map and this bean map
checks for boths versions.
Did not know this; I thought only '/' is allowed.
The "/" is used if an Avalon selector is mimicked. If you access Spring beans
using the Spring Configurator's bean map, the name doesn't matter because the
selection is done based on the interface name.
--
Reinhard Pötz Managing Director, {Indoqa} GmbH
http://www.indoqa.com/en/people/reinhard.poetz/
Member of the Apache Software Foundation
Apache Cocoon Committer, PMC member, PMC Chair [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________________________________________________
