On Dec 7, 2007, at 9:25 AM, Reinhard Poetz wrote:
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
On Dec 7, 2007, at 2:59 AM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Thanks for quick fix! btw why bean is named
"org.apache.cocoon.portal.om.CopletAdapter.cocoon" and not
"org.apache.cocoon.portal.om.CopletAdapter/cocoon"?
Good question - to be honest, I don't know :)
I think there were some problems with using a "/" in Spring bean
names
Hmm... That's bad.
It's not really a problem. You can't use "/" in id attributes. That
was the reason why <bean name=""/> was introduced because Spring
webflow needed a way to put URIs into bean ids.
But we are talking about name attribute? Is there a problem with it too?
it doesn't matter as these components are
accessed through our spring configurator bean map and this bean map
checks for boths versions.
Did not know this; I thought only '/' is allowed.
The "/" is used if an Avalon selector is mimicked. If you access
Spring beans using the Spring Configurator's bean map, the name
doesn't matter because the selection is done based on the interface
name.
So Carsten was wrong above? It does not rely on syntax but interface
name?
Vadim
