I could have phrased it better, so I’ll do so now; R14 is still widely used in production and is very stable. R15 and R16 have known stability problems that affect deployments using NIF’s that can potentially run for longer than a millisecond before returning control to the scheduler.
I am not blackmailing the project but I hope you can understand how I feel about your suggestion to remove the ability for Cloudant to continue working after we are making such a large contribution and, further, seeking to move our active development to couchdb itself. B. On 22 Jan 2014, at 13:01, Benoit Chesneau <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Dave Cottlehuber <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 22 January 2014 13:23, Benoit Chesneau <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Robert Samuel Newson >>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Benoit, >>>> >>>> Cloudant requires R14 support, it would mean our contribution to couchdb >>>> becomes useless to us and we could not contribute further. >>>> >>> >>> Are you using blackmail? Is this the position of the Cloudant company? >> >> Hi Benoit, >> >> Your comment reads like an ad hominem attack, and I don't think Bob's >> point, nor Bob, nor Cloudant, deserved that. >> > > My questions stand. The way it is formulated, and that's not the first > time, is not that clear at all.
