I did had quite some interest on commons some time ago but as there was not to much evolution related to them (due to other parts of Felix that had more priority - fact that I respect) I just switched to the other approach Stuart was mentioning. I still consider that commons should be there as this wrapping is not not for "novice" users since they can have a "naive" approach of exporting / importing everything and because it will lower the adoption barrier on osgi.From my point of view I vote +1 on all the artifacts in principle due to the purpose of them, but I think it would be hard to vote on each of them invidually because this would require from my side at least a check on each of them to figure out if the right imports/exports are there and have imports have the right optionality. I liked the approach that was suggested earlier on the list that we should go with a minimal check on the osgi metadata and improve them with the help of comunity that use them, a validation that we can not archive with votes.
Alin Dreghiciu On 8/24/07, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm wondering if there is any interest in the commons releases I tried > to push out at all? So far, only Felix has responded. > > I would say, that if there is no interest we can just drop the whole > thing from svn - however if there is interest it would be great to get > some feedback (even "negative"). As a minimum we should get the parent > pom out I think. > > So every response is welcome except silence :) > > Thanks > Carsten > > -- > Carsten Ziegeler > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
