It doesn't bother me if you do it all at once to give us 2562 -- whatever works.
Are you going to apply David Jencks' fix so Geronimo builds again, or does David or someone else need to do it? Thanks, Aaron On 5/24/06, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is the most relevant form of communication for OpenEJB activity at the moment. So... I'm about to start replaying the openejb commits lost during the codehaus crash. There's already been a commit to openejb 2.1 (the repo is now at rc 2651). So, I'm not going to be able to reproduce the exact rc 2656 that openejb was at prior to the crash. Instead, we'll end up at 2657. I'm not sure how svn will behave after we catch up/pass rc 2656. Probably should assume that a fresh co will be required. I don't know of any other way of proceeding. Any harm has already been done. If anyone has better ideas, speak soon... --kevan
