Kevan Miller wrote:
OK. That's good information. But, IMO, that doesn't necessarily mean
we shouldn't move the monitoring plugin out of sandbox. It might mean
that we aren't ready to *release* the monitoring plugin. I don't think
we're having a *release* discussion -- at least we shouldn't be. We
can have the discussion that we don't want to hold up a Geronimo 2.1
release waiting for monitoring plugin problems to be resolved, but I'd
prefer we discuss without a particular timeline in mind...
IMO, we have the following questions to answer:
1. Are we ready to move monitoring plugin out of sandbox?
Yes, I definitely believe so, although I might be marginally biased =P
2. If yes, then where should we move it to? Should it be in
server/trunk/plugins or should the monitoring plugin be a subproject.
I was thinking server/trunk/plugins myself... the only other option
would be just straight plugins... however, correct me if I'm wrong on
this, but I believe just /plugins is more for things that can be used
independent of geronimo... which is definitely not the case for the
monitoring plugin currently.
3. What bug fixes/new features need to be added to the monitoring
plugin before it's ready to be released?
The single biggest thing on my mind for this currently is the new
graphing engine that I mentioned, but whether or not it's part of
server/trunk/plugins has no bearing on this getting done.
Anita,
Your objections seem to be in category 3, but I may be wrong. So, help
us understand what you're thinking...
--kevan
Thanks,
Erik B. Craig
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
