Isn't the JSR 77 spec JMX based? Jeff
Viet Nguyen wrote: > Yes, with the current implementation we have, OpenEJB is a > prerequisite. JMX is a good solution too, but I wanted to follow the > JSR 77 spec, which tells us to communicate with the server through the > usage of MEJB, which is why OpenEJB is needed in this case. > > --Viet
