:-( --jason
-----Original Message----- From: Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:44:12 To:Geronimo Dev <[email protected]> Subject: problem with spec releases Guillaume, I'm extremely sorry to say that the javadoc and sources jars all seem to be missing the required license and notice files. Not sure what might have changed, build-wise. The previous versions contain them -- geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1-javadoc.jar <http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec/1.1/geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1-javadoc.jar> and geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1-sources.jar <http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec/1.1/geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1-sources.jar> However, they are missing from the candidate jars -- geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1.1-javadoc.jar <http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/staging/geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1.1/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec/1.1.1/geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1.1-javadoc.jar> and geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1.1-sources.jar <http://people.apache.org/~gnodet/staging/geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1.1/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec/1.1.1/geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1.1-sources.jar> I sampled additional jars and it seems to be a problem in all of the new specs. Something we overlooked, previously, is geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1.1/src/main/resources/javax/servlet/resources/XMLSchema.dtd The license/notice file for geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec should contain the w3c license (http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/copyright-software-19980720 <http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/copyright-software-19980720> , I believe) and an attribution in the notice file. Other than the above, all looks good. --kevan
