I'm getting the patch ready for this... Would a separate bug be needed or shall we use the existing bug but modify it? A single patch will address both issues... Thanks, Sangjin
On Feb 12, 2008 11:12 AM, Rick McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sangjin Lee wrote: > > While looking at an issue related with a form post (GERONIMO-3839), I > > found an even more glaring issue. Namely, any caller-supplied request > > body is ignored by HttpRequestEncoder. For example, you may want to > > do a simple file upload using an octet stream. One can set the > > content using HttpMessage.addContent(byte[]). > I sort of wondered about that hard-coded content type when I was working > on the header changes. I'm glad it bothered somebody else enough to > investigate. > > Rick > > > > > However, HttpRequestEncoder makes a specific assumption that all post > > requests are form posts. Therefore, it ignores any message body, and > > simply encodes the form into the body. We need to be able to handle > > this properly. I'll file a bug shortly... > > > > Thanks, > > Sangjin > > > >
