Sangjin Lee wrote:
I'm getting the patch ready for this... Would a separate bug be
needed or shall we use the existing bug but modify it? A single patch
will address both issues...
I think we can use the already existing one. That patch has not been
committed to the codebase yet.
Rick
Thanks,
Sangjin
On Feb 12, 2008 11:12 AM, Rick McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
Sangjin Lee wrote:
> While looking at an issue related with a form post
(GERONIMO-3839), I
> found an even more glaring issue. Namely, any caller-supplied
request
> body is ignored by HttpRequestEncoder. For example, you may want to
> do a simple file upload using an octet stream. One can set the
> content using HttpMessage.addContent(byte[]).
I sort of wondered about that hard-coded content type when I was
working
on the header changes. I'm glad it bothered somebody else enough to
investigate.
Rick
>
> However, HttpRequestEncoder makes a specific assumption that all
post
> requests are form posts. Therefore, it ignores any message
body, and
> simply encodes the form into the body. We need to be able to handle
> this properly. I'll file a bug shortly...
>
> Thanks,
> Sangjin
>
