Agreed, the only thing is that we've been calling it Little-G for quite some
time now. Would it be too bad to call the assembly that way?
Lets face it, Little-G sounds a lot cooler that geronimo-minimal. Another thing in favor of
keeping Little-G name is that "minimal" would not be as representative anymore since the
Geronimo framework would actually the "new" minimal.
Cheers!
Hernan
Joe Bohn wrote:
Hernan Cunico wrote:
I saw several times the term micro-g as well as geronimo framework (or
just framework) used indifferently as synonymous.
I'm trying to standardize the term in the docs and would help a lot if
we agree to call it the same way.
If no one oppose I'll propose we stick to "Geronimo framework" as it
also matches the assembly name.
Cheers!
Hernan
If we're going to do that (I think it's probably a good idea) ... then
should we also consider using the term "minimal" consistently instead of
little-G?
Joe
