I'd say call it minimal and just leave "little-g" as a nickname, since
I think folks like to call it little-g, but technically it is minimal,
or lite really :-P
--jason
On Mar 6, 2008, at 5:27 AM, Hernan Cunico wrote:
Agreed, the only thing is that we've been calling it Little-G for
quite some time now. Would it be too bad to call the assembly that
way?
Lets face it, Little-G sounds a lot cooler that geronimo-minimal.
Another thing in favor of keeping Little-G name is that "minimal"
would not be as representative anymore since the Geronimo framework
would actually the "new" minimal.
Cheers!
Hernan
Joe Bohn wrote:
Hernan Cunico wrote:
I saw several times the term micro-g as well as geronimo framework
(or just framework) used indifferently as synonymous.
I'm trying to standardize the term in the docs and would help a
lot if we agree to call it the same way.
If no one oppose I'll propose we stick to "Geronimo framework" as
it also matches the assembly name.
Cheers!
Hernan
If we're going to do that (I think it's probably a good idea) ...
then should we also consider using the term "minimal" consistently
instead of little-G?
Joe
