On 4/16/2010 3:40 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
A little confused here....
For JPA, you mentioned jpa_3.0_spec-1.2, but I'm guessing you meant
jpa_2.0_spec-1.2.
Looking at the tags, I see 2 releases of jpa_2.0_spec since I released
the jpa_2.0_spec-1.0 release -
2.0_spec-1.0.1
2.0_spec-1.2
But only the 2.0_spec-1.2 artifacts are in the staging repo. Looks like
you created the 1.0.1 tag -
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r934135 | rickmcguire | 2010-04-14 15:21:41 -0400 (Wed, 14 Apr 2010) | 1
line
[maven-scm] copy for tag geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec-1.0.1
------------------------------------------------------------------------
If this is not being released, shouldn't we delete it from svn?
Yes, looks like there was a problem with the rollback. I'll delete that.
Also, why did we jump to 1.2 instead of using jpa_2.0_spec-1.1 as the
next version?
This likely happened because of the rollback problem and the
interactions with the release plugin. I'd really prefer to not have to
roll everything back and restart the vote because of this issue. I hope
this would be ok as long as we don't have the same "time travel" issues
from the previous vote.
Rick
-Donald
On 4/16/10 10:43 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to
release Java EE 6 versions of the geronimo specifications. This is a
single vote
for all specs new or updated for Java EE 6. In addition, the specs have
been updated
with common support for OSGi interactions. The RAT and IANAL plugins
have been run against
of the projects. All non-beta specs have clean TCK signature tests.
Vote will be open for 72 hours.
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-030/
Unless noted, the source repos are relative to location
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/
and have the same final element as the artifact name.
I am not listing each location individually because the mailing list
server rejected my
original email as spam because of the large number of links in the
email. I apologize for the incovenience.
The following specs are being voted on
geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.1
geronimo-annotation_1.1_spec-1.0
geronimo-atinject_1.0_spec-1.0
geronimo-ejb_3.1_spec-1.0
geronimo-el_2.2_spec-1.0
geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec-1.0
geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.6_spec-1.0
geronimo-jacc_1.4_spec-1.0
geronimo-jaspic_1.0_spec-1.0
geronimo-javaee-deployment_1.1MR3_spec-1.0.1
geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.7
and the closely associated provider and uber jar releases.
geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8
Source location:
geronimo/javamail/tags/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8
geronimo-jaxb_2.2_spec-1.0
geronimo-jaxr_1.0_spec-2.1
geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.1
geronimo-jaxrs_1.1_spec-1.0
geronimo-jaxws_2.2_spec-1.0
geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec-1.0
geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.2
geronimo-jsp_2.2_spec-1.0
geronimo-osgi-support-1.0
geronimo-saaj_1.3_spec-1.1
geronimo-servlet_3.0_spec-1.0
geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.0
geronimo-validation_1.0_spec-1.1
geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.3
geronimo-ccpp_1.0_spec-1.0-beta (this is a beta version that has not
been verified via TCK yet)
