Another tag to cleanup -
geronimo-validation_1.0_spec-1.0.1
-Donald
On 4/19/10 6:12 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> On 4/16/2010 3:40 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
>> A little confused here....
>>
>> For JPA, you mentioned jpa_3.0_spec-1.2, but I'm guessing you meant
>> jpa_2.0_spec-1.2.
>>
>> Looking at the tags, I see 2 releases of jpa_2.0_spec since I released
>> the jpa_2.0_spec-1.0 release -
>> 2.0_spec-1.0.1
>> 2.0_spec-1.2
>> But only the 2.0_spec-1.2 artifacts are in the staging repo. Looks like
>> you created the 1.0.1 tag -
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> r934135 | rickmcguire | 2010-04-14 15:21:41 -0400 (Wed, 14 Apr 2010) | 1
>> line
>> [maven-scm] copy for tag geronimo-jpa_2.0_spec-1.0.1
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> If this is not being released, shouldn't we delete it from svn?
>>
> Yes, looks like there was a problem with the rollback. I'll delete that.
>
>
>> Also, why did we jump to 1.2 instead of using jpa_2.0_spec-1.1 as the
>> next version?
>>
> This likely happened because of the rollback problem and the
> interactions with the release plugin. I'd really prefer to not have to
> roll everything back and restart the vote because of this issue. I hope
> this would be ok as long as we don't have the same "time travel" issues
> from the previous vote.
>
> Rick
>
>>
>> -Donald
>>
>>
>> On 4/16/10 10:43 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>>
>>> To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to
>>> release Java EE 6 versions of the geronimo specifications. This is a
>>> single vote
>>> for all specs new or updated for Java EE 6. In addition, the specs have
>>> been updated
>>> with common support for OSGi interactions. The RAT and IANAL plugins
>>> have been run against
>>> of the projects. All non-beta specs have clean TCK signature tests.
>>>
>>> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>>
>>>
>>> Staging repo:
>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-030/
>>>
>>>
>>> Unless noted, the source repos are relative to location
>>>
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/
>>>
>>> and have the same final element as the artifact name.
>>>
>>> I am not listing each location individually because the mailing list
>>> server rejected my
>>> original email as spam because of the large number of links in the
>>> email. I apologize for the incovenience.
>>>
>>> The following specs are being voted on
>>>
>>> geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.1
>>> geronimo-annotation_1.1_spec-1.0
>>> geronimo-atinject_1.0_spec-1.0
>>> geronimo-ejb_3.1_spec-1.0
>>> geronimo-el_2.2_spec-1.0
>>> geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec-1.0
>>> geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.6_spec-1.0
>>> geronimo-jacc_1.4_spec-1.0
>>> geronimo-jaspic_1.0_spec-1.0
>>> geronimo-javaee-deployment_1.1MR3_spec-1.0.1
>>> geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.7
>>>
>>> and the closely associated provider and uber jar releases.
>>>
>>> geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8
>>>
>>> Source location:
>>> geronimo/javamail/tags/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8
>>>
>>> geronimo-jaxb_2.2_spec-1.0
>>> geronimo-jaxr_1.0_spec-2.1
>>> geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.1
>>> geronimo-jaxrs_1.1_spec-1.0
>>> geronimo-jaxws_2.2_spec-1.0
>>> geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec-1.0
>>> geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec-1.2
>>> geronimo-jsp_2.2_spec-1.0
>>> geronimo-osgi-support-1.0
>>> geronimo-saaj_1.3_spec-1.1
>>> geronimo-servlet_3.0_spec-1.0
>>> geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.0
>>> geronimo-validation_1.0_spec-1.1
>>> geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec-1.1.3
>>>
>>> geronimo-ccpp_1.0_spec-1.0-beta (this is a beta version that has not
>>> been verified via TCK yet)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
