On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 12:57 AM, Kevan Miller <[email protected]>wrote:
> > On Jun 22, 2012, at 9:20 AM, Forrest Xia wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Forrest Xia <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Forrest Xia <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Jarek Gawor <[email protected]> wrote: > > How are things with Jetty? Some user emails gave me an impression that > > things don't look too good. If things with Jetty are looking bad then > > we should either consider dropping it from the release or delaying the > > release until we get it in shape. > > Some status consolidation here about Jetty assembly in 3.0 branch: > > 1. BV and DI tck all pass for jetty8-javaee6 assembly > > 2. JCDI and full profile execution just triggered, we will see some > results after two days. > > JCDI tck against jetty8-javaee6 failed most of the cases. > > Jetty assembly results: > > Tests 37068 > > Passed 23616 > > Failed 13452 > > Forrest -- too much TCK information on a public list. TCK terms may be > improving in the future. However, until then, we should not talk about test > names, numbers of tests, etc. > OK, got it, sorry for that. > > --kevan -- Thanks! Regards, Forrest
