Any more thoughts on droping jetty assembly from 3.0.0 release? or I will go ahead to make the change and roll out 3.0.0 release...
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Shawn Jiang <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 to drop Jetty release from 3.0.0 release for now. > > > On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Forrest Xia <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Echo Jarek's response here in dev list again: >> >> So it looks like we have quite a bit of failures on Jetty. I guess we >> either have to drop it from the release (if we want to release soon) >> or try to fix it and delay the release. Thoughts? >> >> My thought is to drop jetty release for 3.0.0 and roll out tomcat >> assembly asap. Any more thoughts about 3.0.0 release?? >> >> >> On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Forrest Xia <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 12:57 AM, Kevan Miller >>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On Jun 22, 2012, at 9:20 AM, Forrest Xia wrote: >>>> >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Forrest Xia <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Forrest Xia <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Jarek Gawor <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> > How are things with Jetty? Some user emails gave me an impression that >>>> > things don't look too good. If things with Jetty are looking bad then >>>> > we should either consider dropping it from the release or delaying the >>>> > release until we get it in shape. >>>> > Some status consolidation here about Jetty assembly in 3.0 branch: >>>> > 1. BV and DI tck all pass for jetty8-javaee6 assembly >>>> > 2. JCDI and full profile execution just triggered, we will see some >>>> results after two days. >>>> > JCDI tck against jetty8-javaee6 failed most of the cases. >>>> > Jetty assembly results: >>>> > Tests 37068 >>>> > Passed 23616 >>>> > Failed 13452 >>>> >>>> Forrest -- too much TCK information on a public list. TCK terms may be >>>> improving in the future. However, until then, we should not talk about test >>>> names, numbers of tests, etc. >>>> >>> OK, got it, sorry for that. >>> >>>> >>>> --kevan >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Thanks! >>> >>> Regards, Forrest >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Thanks! >> >> Regards, Forrest >> >> > > > -- > Shawn > -- Thanks! Regards, Forrest
