+1 (non-binding) Thanks, Prashant
On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 10:16 AM Russell Spitzer <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 - My comments are clear on the other thread for future proposals > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 11:18 AM Szehon Ho <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> -0 >> >> Great work and exciting functionality, but transferring concerns from the >> other thread about the decision. >> >> Thanks >> Szehon >> >> On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 9:12 AM Steven Wu <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 1:07 AM xianjin <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 (non binding) >>>> >>>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 2:28 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 (non binding) >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> JB >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 10:45 PM Anton Okolnychyi < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > Hi folks, >>>>> > >>>>> > We have been discussing the new layout for position deletes in V3 >>>>> for a while now. It seems the community reached consensus. I'd like to >>>>> start a vote on adding deletion vectors to the V3 spec as described in PRs >>>>> 11238 and 11240. You can see a prototype of the proposed spec changes in >>>>> PR >>>>> 11302. >>>>> > >>>>> > Design doc discussion thread: >>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/8ypt0jowf3zosw6f6bxt25jxc3vdgps9 >>>>> > Spec changes discussion thread: >>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/wyon0kvroxsmkxh153444xzscwbb68o1 >>>>> > >>>>> > Please vote in the next 72 hours >>>>> > >>>>> > [ ] +1, commit the proposed spec changes >>>>> > [ ] -0 >>>>> > [ ] -1, do not make these changes because... >>>>> > >>>>> > - Anton >>>>> >>>>
