+1 (non-binding) Thanks, Steve Zhang
> On Oct 31, 2024, at 3:41 PM, [email protected] wrote: > > +1 > > Thanks, Anton! > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 11:58 PM Fokko Driesprong <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> +1 >> >> I had to read up a bit, thanks for driving this Anton. >> >> Kind regards, >> Fokko >> >> Op do 31 okt 2024 om 07:53 schreef Piotr Findeisen >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>: >>> Thank you Anton, >>> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, 31 Oct 2024 at 05:07, John Zhuge <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>> >>>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 1:56 PM Anton Okolnychyi <[email protected] >>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>> >>>>> - Anton >>>>> >>>>> ср, 30 жовт. 2024 р. о 21:32 Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected] >>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> пише: >>>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Amogh Jahagirdar >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 1:28 PM Bryan Keller <[email protected] >>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>>>> +1! >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Oct 30, 2024, at 11:03 AM, Daniel Weeks <[email protected] >>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -Dan >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 10:51 AM Prashant Singh >>>>>>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>> Prashant >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 10:16 AM Russell Spitzer >>>>>>>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> +1 - My comments are clear on the other thread for future proposals >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 11:18 AM Szehon Ho <[email protected] >>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> -0 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Great work and exciting functionality, but transferring concerns >>>>>>>>>>> from the other thread about the decision. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>>>> Szehon >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 9:12 AM Steven Wu <[email protected] >>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 1:07 AM xianjin <[email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non binding) >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 2:28 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré >>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non binding) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>>>>>> JB >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 10:45 PM Anton Okolnychyi >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Hi folks, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > We have been discussing the new layout for position deletes in >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > V3 for a while now. It seems the community reached consensus. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > I'd like to start a vote on adding deletion vectors to the V3 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > spec as described in PRs 11238 and 11240. You can see a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > prototype of the proposed spec changes in PR 11302. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Design doc discussion thread: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/8ypt0jowf3zosw6f6bxt25jxc3vdgps9 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Spec changes discussion thread: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/wyon0kvroxsmkxh153444xzscwbb68o1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Please vote in the next 72 hours >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > [ ] +1, commit the proposed spec changes >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > [ ] -0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > [ ] -1, do not make these changes because... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > - Anton >>>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> John Zhuge
