On 1/10/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > A problem is that we'll be publishing things like log4j 1.1-dev,
> > probably we should relocate this to log4j-1.1-2005.... to keep it
> > consistent. m1 would still get the 1.1-dev but m2 will get the
> > snapshot and a warning if somebody tries to use it.
>
> I don't think so. The Maven 1.x repository basically doesn't exist (its
> not web accessible). They are identical.
>


yep, but m1 won't follow pom relocations

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to